Old Weird Ward
Unless otherwise noted, that which is posted here is opinion, which is protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. If you don't like my opinions, go somewhere else. Nobody is forcing you to actually read this drivel.
The presumption exists that you can read at all.
That may be a large assumption.
Blog Roll
|
Tuesday, March 30, 2004
- - - - - Analysis of the Clinton Record on Terrorism - - - - -
I never did like the Clinton administration's policies on terrorism and foreign relations. I always thought that they were inept in dealing with terrorism, and much too conscious of foreign opinion. HERE is an analysis that supports my opinion of the Clinton policies. It also paints a picture of how a Kerry administration would most likely deal with external threats to the US.
Excerpt: The Bush record on fighting terrorism is as it stands. Meanwhile, voters who wonder "how would a Kerry administration prosecute the war on terror?" need to look no further than this list for some idea of the answer. Unless, of course, Kerry disassociates himself from the policies of his Democratic predecessors, or criticizes them as forcefully as his fellow Democrat on the 9/11 commission, Bob Kerrey, did last week.
- - - - - Right to Comfort - - - - -
You're all aware that the First Amendment doesn't hold true on America's college campuses, right? Especially if you are an employee.
You didn't know?
This sort of thing is one of my pet peeves. It's definitely OK for a "politically correct person" to verbally abuse some other person, but if you even mention one of the transgressions of a "politically correct person", you are automatically "politically incorrect", and subject to disciplinary action, vilification, and yet more abuse from "politically correct persons."
It is your tax dollars paying for this sort of crap, folks. Read all about it, HERE
Excerpt: ...when I found out that I made a co-worker feel “uncomfortable,” I wanted to know what I had said or done to produce such an unthinkable result. That was when I learned that the “discomfort” occurred because I had been discussing some of my weekly columns here in the workplace (i.e., at the public university). The penalty for that transgression was simple: a ban on discussing my columns in the office in front of those who might be offended by my opinions. This was accompanied by the shocking revelation that “not everyone sees things the way you do, Mike.”
|
|
